home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.netspace.net.au!usenet
- From: astroboy@netspace.net.au (Paul Dossett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:56:20 GMT
- Organization: NetSpace Online Systems
- Message-ID: <914.6624T948T1719@netspace.net.au>
- References: <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <754.6613T992T1265@netspace.net.au>
- <1843.6614T1133T2864@imaginet.fr> <3211.6619T1119T2167@netspace.net.au> <4fvasl$29h@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-a1-34.mel.netspace.net.au
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- T. Wright (tw116@cus.cam.ac.uk) said:
-
- >>I really wish that wasn't the case, but I cannot find a decent 24bit board
- >>for my 2000 for love or money. And no, I don't classify a Picasso II as a
- >>decent board. I was on the lookout for a Piccolo SD64, but it seems they
- >>are a figment of somebodys imagination because I can't get one.
- >>
- >>I'm now waiting for the Picasso III to come out to weigh up my options
- >>again.
-
- >Out of interest, what is wrong with the Picasso board? How do these
- >compare with ECS/AGA?
-
- It's just not nearly as fast as the other boards, and can only take 2Mb of
- VRAM. It's still a lot faster than ECS/AGA for workbench displays and Doom-a-
- likes.
-
-
- --
- Paul Dossett | Yamaha, Epiphone, Pearl, Paiste | Amiga 2000/040/21/365/3.1 __
- -------------| RASTER Bubble Bobble betatester | Amiga CD32/020/2/CD/3.1__///
- boo! : astroboy@netspace.net.au.. | '76 Toyota Corolla 1.2 \XX/
-
-